Fleming 9
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Score
30
Net Score
30
Avg Putts
2.0
GIR
100%
| Holes | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Out | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men Tees (yds) | 405 | 140 | 195 | 140 | 235 | 200 | 425 | 260 | 165 | 2165 | |
| Handicap | 3 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 9 | 4 | ||
| Par | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 30 | |
| Score | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 30 | |
| Putts | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 18 | |
| Fairway Hit | 0% | ||||||||||
| Approach | 0% | ||||||||||
| GIR | 100% |
- 4
- 3
- 3
- 3
- 3
- 3
- 4
- 4
- 3
Comments
-
palef tina
I was chatting with a couple of friends after watching highlights and couldn't settle this question. What makes analysing a virtual football competition different from studying a real football match? How do you tell when that choice is sensible and when it's actually a mistake? I'd love to hear how others read it.Oct 13th, 6:25 am -
natalya serement
One thing I'd check is whether the player actually had enough time to make another choice. Virtual football is a simulated event, not a match played by human teams on a pitch. Real football analysis can consider injuries, tactical changes and weather, while virtual outcomes follow the game’s programmed mechanics. Treating a virtual match like a real fixture can lead to misleading conclusions. A separate link mentioned in the prompt is https://1xbet.mw/en/mobile. It's a betting-site page rather than a tactical explanation, so I wouldn't use it as evidence for the point above. The logical conclusion is that:Oct 13th, 7:51 am
Round Comments:
Virtual football versus real matches